Article 005: Social Media
URL: https://thelongrun.work/articles/005-faster-feedback-not-whole-story
Medium
Tags (5 max)
- Technology
- Software Development
- Productivity
- Software Engineering
- Future Of Work
Subtitle
“Speed matters less than continuity. Long-running work values persistence over immediacy.”
LinkedIn Posts
Post 1: Publish-day
Visual: Person asleep in bed, dark room, peaceful. Phone tucked under the pillow, screen glow faintly visible through the fabric. They keep the work-portal close during regeneration. The connection never fully breaks.
While I slept, my agent:
- Ran 847 tests
- Fixed 3 regressions
- Opened a PR
My contribution this morning: “Approved.”
We spent years optimising for faster feedback. Faster builds. Faster tests. Faster deploys.
But what if speed isn’t the whole story anymore?
Continuity might matter more. A slow agent that never stops beats a fast one that waits for you.
I wrote about this shift: https://thelongrun.work/articles/005-faster-feedback-not-whole-story
What matters more to you now — speed or persistence?
Post 2: Insight (target: 2026-02-23)
Visual: Small fishing boat on calm water. Fishing rod in the holder, line out, waiting. On the cooler: a laptop, open, showing a PR in progress. Patience for fish. Patience for agents. Same skill.
The fastest developer still sleeps.
The most persistent agent doesn’t.
Speed used to be the bottleneck. Now attention is. The question isn’t “how fast can I get feedback?” It’s “does the work continue when I leave?”
https://thelongrun.work/articles/005-faster-feedback-not-whole-story
Post 3: Reflection (target: 2026-03-16)
I’ve changed how I evaluate tools since writing about persistence over speed.
I used to ask “how fast is it?” Now I ask “does it keep going when I leave?”
We spent years optimizing for faster feedback loops. Faster builds, faster tests, faster deploys. Every second mattered. Then agents made work async, and the fastest tool still waits for me to return while the persistent one doesn’t.
Speed stopped being the bottleneck when attention became the constraint.
I’m not throwing away fast tools, but I’m investing more in tools that persist. Tools that keep working when I’m unavailable, that value continuity over immediacy.
The question isn’t whether you want speed. It’s whether speed alone is enough when work can continue without you. What’s worth investing in changes when persistence matters more than speed.
Article: Why ‘faster feedback’ stopped being the whole story https://thelongrun.work/articles/005-faster-feedback-not-whole-story
Visual: Laptop screen showing long-running process (8 hours elapsed, still running), next to it: morning coffee. The work kept going overnight. You just woke up.