Requirements Document
Introduction
The AI Development Gateway is a system that provides a chat-based interface for building software projects using cloud-hosted AI models, while enforcing a structured software development lifecycle with explicit approvals, guardrails, and Git-native state management. The system integrates BMAD (Business Method and Design) methodology to structure workflows, manage artifacts, and ensure systematic progression through development phases.
Glossary
- Gateway: The chat gateway service that routes requests, enforces lifecycle rules, and manages project context
- Project: A Git repository or subdirectory containing an .ai/ directory with project specifications
- Lifecycle_Stage: One of the sequential development phases: requirements, design, tasks, implementation, review
- State_File: The state.yaml file that contains the authoritative representation of current project state
- Approval: A Git commit that represents explicit human approval for stage transitions or artifacts
- AI_Model: Cloud-hosted language models (Claude, ChatGPT, etc.) accessed via APIs
- OpenWebUI: The open-source chat UI and plugin host used as the presentation layer
- BMAD_Method: Business Method and Design workflow engine that manages roles, phases, and artifact generation
- BMAD_Role: Specific development roles (Business Analyst, Method Designer, Solution Architect, Developer) with defined capabilities and responsibilities
- BMAD_Phase: Sequential development phases with role-specific activities and deliverables
- BMAD_Artifact: Structured deliverables (requirements, designs, code) generated and managed through BMAD workflows
Requirements
Requirement 1: Chat-Based Development Interface
User Story: As a developer, I want to build software projects through a chat interface, so that I can interact naturally with AI assistance during development.
Acceptance Criteria
- WHEN a user accesses the system, THE Gateway SHALL provide a fully functional chat interface
- WHEN a user initiates a development task, THE Gateway SHALL support asynchronous workflows without requiring continuous interaction
- THE Gateway SHALL render all project artifacts (markdown, diffs, diagrams) in a readable format
- WHEN a user switches between projects, THE Gateway SHALL maintain separate context for each project
- THE Gateway SHALL provide one-tap approval actions for stage transitions and artifact approvals
Requirement 2: Git-Native State Management
User Story: As a project stakeholder, I want all project state and history to be stored in Git, so that the project is fully auditable and reconstructable.
Acceptance Criteria
- THE Gateway SHALL store all project specifications in the .ai/ directory within the Git repository
- WHEN a lifecycle stage transition occurs, THE Gateway SHALL require a Git commit that modifies state.yaml
- WHEN an approval is granted, THE Gateway SHALL represent it as a Git commit with structured metadata
- THE Gateway SHALL NOT maintain any hidden or external state required to reconstruct project history
- WHEN a project is accessed, THE Gateway SHALL load context exclusively from the Git repository contents
Requirement 3: Structured Development Lifecycle
User Story: As a development team lead, I want AI assistance to follow a structured development process, so that software quality and governance requirements are met.
Acceptance Criteria
- THE Gateway SHALL enforce the sequential lifecycle stages: requirements → design → tasks → implementation → review
- WHEN AI attempts to perform an action, THE Gateway SHALL restrict capabilities based on the current lifecycle stage
- WHEN a stage transition is requested, THE Gateway SHALL require explicit human approval via Git commit
- THE Gateway SHALL prevent modification of approved artifacts unless the lifecycle is explicitly reset
- WHEN CI validation fails, THE Gateway SHALL block progression to the next stage
Requirement 4: AI Model Integration and Guardrails
User Story: As a developer, I want to use AI as a constrained contributor, so that I maintain control over the development process while benefiting from AI assistance.
Acceptance Criteria
- WHEN in requirements stage, THE Gateway SHALL limit AI to text generation capabilities only
- WHEN in design stage, THE Gateway SHALL allow AI text generation and diagram creation
- WHEN in tasks stage, THE Gateway SHALL allow AI repository reading and task generation
- WHEN in implementation stage, THE Gateway SHALL allow AI diff generation and pull request creation
- WHEN in review stage, THE Gateway SHALL allow AI to access CI status and provide summaries
- THE Gateway SHALL generate code only as diffs, never as direct file modifications
- THE Gateway SHALL NOT allow AI to push directly to protected branches or bypass GitOps workflows
Requirement 5: Project Context Isolation
User Story: As a developer working on multiple projects, I want strict context isolation between projects, so that AI assistance doesn’t leak information or make incorrect assumptions.
Acceptance Criteria
- WHEN a chat session is initiated, THE Gateway SHALL bind it to exactly one project
- WHEN AI processes a request, THE Gateway SHALL load context only from files within the project’s defined scope
- THE Gateway SHALL NOT share context, history, or state between different projects
- WHEN switching projects, THE Gateway SHALL clear all previous project context from AI memory
- THE Gateway SHALL enforce project scope boundaries defined in
project.yamlusing included and excluded path patterns - WHEN a project attempts to access files outside its scope, THE Gateway SHALL reject the operation
Requirement 6: Authentication and Security
User Story: As a system administrator, I want secure access controls and audit trails, so that the system meets enterprise security requirements.
Acceptance Criteria
- THE Gateway SHALL require authenticated access for all operations
- WHEN authentication tokens are issued, THE Gateway SHALL use short-lived tokens with automatic expiration
- THE Gateway SHALL NOT expose secrets or sensitive configuration to AI models
- WHEN AI actions are performed, THE Gateway SHALL create traceable audit logs via Git history
- THE Gateway SHALL store secrets exclusively in secure secret stores, not in Git repositories
Requirement 7: Git Operations and Pull Request Workflow
User Story: As a developer, I want AI to create pull requests for code changes, so that I can review and approve changes before they are merged.
Acceptance Criteria
- WHEN AI generates code changes, THE Gateway SHALL create them as pull requests on feature branches
- THE Gateway SHALL have read access to repository contents for context understanding
- THE Gateway SHALL NOT force push or merge without explicit human approval
- WHEN creating pull requests, THE Gateway SHALL include structured commit messages with AI action metadata
- THE Gateway SHALL respect protected branch policies and mandatory CI requirements
Requirement 8: Kubernetes Runtime Observability
User Story: As a developer, I want AI to help me understand the runtime state of my applications, so that I can troubleshoot issues and monitor deployments.
Acceptance Criteria
- THE Gateway SHALL provide AI read-only access to Kubernetes deployment status
- WHEN queried about application health, THE Gateway SHALL summarize pod health and restart information
- THE Gateway SHALL provide access to summarized application logs for troubleshooting
- THE Gateway SHALL NOT allow any write operations to Kubernetes resources
- WHEN runtime changes are needed, THE Gateway SHALL enforce GitOps workflows for all modifications
Requirement 9: CI/CD Integration and Validation
User Story: As a development team, I want automated validation of lifecycle compliance, so that governance rules are consistently enforced.
Acceptance Criteria
- WHEN code changes are proposed before implementation stage, THE CI_Pipeline SHALL reject the changes
- WHEN specification changes are proposed after approval, THE CI_Pipeline SHALL reject the changes
- WHEN invalid lifecycle transitions are attempted, THE CI_Pipeline SHALL block the transition
- WHEN CI validation fails, THE Gateway SHALL prevent progression but MAY propose corrective changes
- THE CI_Pipeline SHALL validate that all AI-generated changes follow diff-only patterns
Requirement 10: Multi-Model AI Support
User Story: As a developer, I want to use different AI models for different tasks, so that I can leverage the strengths of each model type.
Acceptance Criteria
- THE Gateway SHALL support routing requests to multiple hosted AI models (Claude, ChatGPT, others)
- WHEN a project is configured, THE Gateway SHALL respect model preferences specified in project.yaml
- THE Gateway SHALL provide a model-agnostic interface that supports future AI model additions
- WHEN model routing occurs, THE Gateway SHALL maintain consistent context and capability restrictions
- THE Gateway SHALL log which model was used for each AI action for audit purposes
Requirement 11: BMAD Workflow Integration
User Story: As a development team, I want AI assistance to follow structured BMAD methodology, so that development follows proven business methods and produces consistent, high-quality artifacts.
Acceptance Criteria
- THE Gateway SHALL implement BMAD roles (Business Analyst, Method Designer, Solution Architect, Developer) with role-specific AI capabilities
- WHEN a BMAD phase is active, THE Gateway SHALL restrict AI actions to those appropriate for the current role and phase
- THE Gateway SHALL generate and persist BMAD artifacts (requirements, designs, implementation plans) in structured formats
- WHEN transitioning between BMAD phases, THE Gateway SHALL validate that required artifacts are complete and approved
- THE Gateway SHALL maintain BMAD workflow state alongside Git-based project state
- WHEN AI assumes a BMAD role, THE Gateway SHALL provide role-specific context and constraints to the AI model
- THE Gateway SHALL support BMAD artifact templates and ensure consistent artifact structure across projects